Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Perpetual]: New Liquidation System #766

Merged
merged 51 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

[Perpetual]: New Liquidation System #766

merged 51 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

amityadav0
Copy link
Contributor

@amityadav0 amityadav0 commented Sep 2, 2024

Description

  • Add new liquidation system similar to leveragelp
  • Handle Interest rate in cumulative DS
  • Handle funding rate cumulative DS
  • Add closePositions message
  • Add migration script
  • Add tests

What has Changed?

What specific problem were you aiming to address, and how did you successfully resolve it? If tests were not uploaded for this pull request or if coverage decreased, please provide an explanation for the change.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Deployment Notes

Are there any specific considerations to take into account when deploying these changes? This may include new dependencies, scripts that need to be executed, or any aspects that can only be evaluated in a deployed environment.

Screenshots and Videos

Please provide any relevant before and after screenshots by uploading them here. Additionally, demo videos can be highly beneficial in demonstrating the process.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 26.38623% with 385 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.62%. Comparing base (91b6ff7) to head (731c3ad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #766      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.35%   43.62%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files         640      641       +1     
  Lines       21127    21493     +366     
==========================================
+ Hits         9160     9377     +217     
- Misses      10892    11002     +110     
- Partials     1075     1114      +39     
Components Coverage Δ
leveragelp_transactions 93.13% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_lifecycle 88.29% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_keeper 86.58% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_queries 19.28% <100.00%> (ø)
accountedpool_transactions 100.00% <ø> (ø)
accountedpool_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
accountedpool_queries 68.42% <ø> (ø)
amm_transactions 57.93% <ø> (ø)
amm_lifecycle 79.16% <ø> (ø)
amm_keeper 61.13% <ø> (ø)
amm_queries 29.94% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_transactions 78.82% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
assetprofile_keeper 83.33% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_queries 47.41% <ø> (ø)
burner_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
burner_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_queries 63.54% <ø> (ø)
clock_transactions 30.00% <ø> (ø)
clock_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
clock_keeper 76.92% <ø> (ø)
clock_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
commitment_transactions 48.83% <ø> (ø)
commitment_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
commitment_keeper 19.60% <ø> (ø)
commitment_queries 9.33% <ø> (ø)
epochs_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
epochs_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
epochs_keeper 81.81% <ø> (ø)
epochs_queries 85.71% <ø> (ø)
estaking_transactions 48.64% <ø> (ø)
estaking_lifecycle 73.23% <ø> (ø)
estaking_keeper 63.05% <ø> (ø)
estaking_queries 55.31% <ø> (ø)
incentive_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
incentive_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
incentive_keeper 0.00% <ø> (ø)
incentive_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
masterchef_transactions 62.12% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_lifecycle 73.50% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_keeper 89.47% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_queries 45.97% <ø> (ø)
oracle_transactions 31.91% <ø> (ø)
oracle_lifecycle 0.00% <ø> (ø)
oracle_keeper 63.88% <ø> (ø)
oracle_queries 34.90% <ø> (ø)
parameter_transactions 15.11% <ø> (ø)
parameter_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
parameter_keeper 75.00% <ø> (ø)
parameter_queries 60.00% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_transactions 73.91% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_lifecycle 75.00% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_keeper 71.42% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_queries 13.04% <ø> (ø)
tier_transactions 28.57% <ø> (ø)
tier_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
tier_keeper 90.47% <ø> (ø)
tier_queries 20.32% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_transactions 72.32% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
tokenomics_keeper 83.33% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_queries 70.96% <ø> (ø)
transferhook_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
transferhook_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
transferhook_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
transferhook_queries 60.00% <ø> (ø)

@amityadav0 amityadav0 marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2024 07:26
// TODO: Handle stop loss
ctx.EventManager().EmitEvent(sdk.NewEvent(types.EventClosePositions,
sdk.NewAttribute("liquidations", strings.Join(liqLog, "\n")),
//sdk.NewAttribute("stop_loss", strings.Join(closeLog, "\n")),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amityadav0 can we get rid of that?

return sdk.ZeroInt(), err
}
err = k.bankKeeper.SendCoins(ctx, ammPoolAddr, fundAddr, takeCoins)
//err := k.bankKeeper.SendCoinsFromModuleToAccount(ctx, ammPool.Address, fundAddr, takeCoins)
Copy link
Contributor

@cosmic-vagabond cosmic-vagabond Sep 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amityadav0 can we get rid of this comment line?

@cosmic-vagabond cosmic-vagabond merged commit b332936 into main Sep 11, 2024
70 of 71 checks passed
@cosmic-vagabond cosmic-vagabond deleted the perp-liq branch September 11, 2024 05:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants